ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection relative to the general population. We aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors for serious infections in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE treated with rituximab, belimumab, and standard of care therapies in a large national observational cohort. Method(s): The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) is a UK-based prospective register of patients with SLE. Patients were recruited by their treating physician as part of their scheduled care from 64 centres across the UK by use of a standardised case report form. Inclusion criteria for the BILAG-BR included age older than 5 years, ability to provide informed consent, a diagnosis of SLE, and starting a new biological therapy within the last 12 months or a new standard of care drug within the last month. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of serious infections within the first 12 months of therapy. Serious infections were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, hospital admission, or resulting in morbidity or death. Infection and mortality data were collected from study centres and further mortality data were collected from the UK Office for National Statistics. The relationship between serious infection and drug type was analysed using a multiple-failure Cox proportional hazards model. Finding(s): Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 23, 2021, 1383 individuals were recruited to the BILAG-BR. 335 patients were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 1048 participants contributed 1002.7 person-years of follow-up and included 746 (71%) participants on rituximab, 119 (11%) participants on belimumab, and 183 (17%) participants on standard of care. The median age of the cohort was 39 years (IQR 30-50), 942 (90%) of 1048 patients were women and 106 (10%) were men. Of the patients with available ethnicity data, 514 (56%) of 911 were White, 169 (19%) were Asian, 161 (18%) were Black, and 67 (7%) were of multiple-mixed or other ethnic backgrounds. 118 serious infections occurred in 76 individuals during the 12-month study period, which included 92 serious infections in 58 individuals on rituximab, eight serious infections in five individuals receiving belimumab, and 18 serious infections in 13 individuals on standard of care. The overall crude incidence rate of serious infection was 117.7 (95% CI 98.3-141.0) per 1000 person-years. Compared with standard of care, the serious infection risk was similar in the rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.68 [0.60-4.68]) and belimumab groups (1.01 [0.21-4.80]). Across the whole cohort in multivariate analysis, serious infection risk was associated with prednisolone dose (>10 mg;2.38 [95%CI 1.47-3.84]), hypogammaglobulinaemia (<6 g/L;2.16 [1.38-3.37]), and multimorbidity (1.45 [1.17-1.80]). Additional concomitant immunosuppressive use appeared to be associated with a reduced risk (0.60 [0.41-0.90]). We found no significant safety signals regarding atypical infections. Six infection-related deaths occurred at a median of 121 days (IQR 60-151) days from cohort entry. Interpretation(s): In patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, rituximab, belimumab, and standard immunosuppressive therapy have similar serious infection risks. Key risk factors for serious infections included multimorbidity, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and increased glucocorticoid doses. When considering the risk of serious infection, we propose that immunosupppressives, rituximab, and belimumab should be prioritised as mainstay therapies to optimise SLE management and support proactive minimisation of glucocorticoid use. Funding(s): None.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Increasing experience in managing patients with COVID-19 infection has demonstrated the development of autoimmune phenomena following infection. We describe a patient with preceding COVID-19 infection who presented with inflammatory immune myositis, positive myositis antibodies and a normal creatine kinase. Methods N/A Results A 61-year-old Caucasian female presented feeling generally unwell and with weakness. She had COVID-19 infection 4 months prior, which necessitated admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ITU), treatment with dexamethasone and oxygen and subsequent discharge with home continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Other co-morbidities included atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage three, hypertension, obesity, recent pulmonary embolism, obstructive sleep apnoea, chronic lymphoedema and hypercholesterolaemia on atorvastatin. Her mobility had been gradually reducing over the previous months to now requiring a wheelchair. Neurological examination demonstrated bilateral proximal lower limb weakness, power 3/5 and an unsafe swallow, for which a naso-gastric tube was inserted. A nonspecific erythematous pruritic rash was noted on the arms. Full body Computerised tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine were unremarkable. Creatinine kinase (CK) was within normal limits at 81, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was mildly raised at 36. C3 was low at 0.67 and C4 low at 0.03. Cryoglobulins were not detected. She was positive for antinuclear antibody (ANA) (1:320 titre), Ro-52, PM-Scl75, and anti-La. Anti-dsDNA was negative. Electromyography could not be performed due to the presence of chronic lymphoedema. MRI showed symmetrical STIR hyperintense signal changes in the quadriceps muscles bilaterally. A muscle biopsy showed a small focus of mild lymphocyte infiltration in the endomysial connective tissue, mild increase in acid phosphatase expression in many fibres in dotlike pattern, overexpression of HLA-ABC with deposits of complement found in in endomysial capillaries, consistent with a diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy. Following commenced of 60mg prednisolone daily, there was a marked improvement in swallowing and the NG tube was removed. A positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed non-specific marrow, splenic and adrenal hyperplasia. The patient was then started on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), but was switched to azathioprine due to side effects. On review following discharge, the patient continues to require a wheelchair to mobilise, but there has been improvement in her swallow and she reports feeling better within herself. Conclusion Inflammatory myositis is a rare sequela of COVID-19 infection. The development of myositis-specific antibodies post infection has previously been described. This case highlights the significant dysphagia and debility despite a normal CK and the need for a high index of suspicion. Possible triggers of an inflammatory response predisposing to autoimmune phenomena include molecular mimicry, bystander activation, exposure of previously hidden epitopes to activated T cells, activation of Toll-like receptors and activation of the complement system.